Model discovery workbench

Move from a crowded market to a defensible shortlist. Rank models by capability, task economics, speed, context, and real provider availability.
Models
164
Providers
104
Provider data fetched
Oct 12, 2026, 20:38 UTC
Method
Index v4.3
Newest release
Oct 7, 2026
Rank by

Provider endpoints

23 results · sorted by intelligence

Underlined names open model pages. Use the chevron for endpoint details.
1GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Modalintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
2GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Zaiintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
3GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Basetenintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
4GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Novitaintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
5GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Deepinfraintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
6GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · SiliconFlowintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
7GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Waferintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
8GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Together.aiintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
9GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Fireworksintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
10GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Databricksintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
11GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · GMIintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
12GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Parasailintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
13GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Bitdeer AIintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
14GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · FriendliAIintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
15GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Nebiusintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
16GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · DigitalOceanintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
17GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · CoreWeaveintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
18GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Crusoe (FP4)intelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
19GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · Inco (FAST)intelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
20GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · LithosAI (FP4)intelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
21GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · LithosAI (FP4, ULTRA CHAT)intelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
22GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · PrimaLabsintelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context
23GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI · LithosAI (FP4, ULTRA)intelligence41.8Task $0.253Response 44s1.0M context

Reading the field

How to use this LLM ranking page

Start with capability, then force the economics

Frontier models often cluster tightly on raw intelligence. Cost per task, response time, provider coverage, and context length usually create the real shortlist.

Move from discovery to a defensible final pick

Use Explore to find the shape of the market, then move into Compare or use the Agentic Fit Finder when task-level reliability and cost matter more than chat quality alone.

Field notes

Questions builders ask

What is the best LLM in 2026?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the overall quality ranking right now. The best model for you depends on your use case — coding, cost, speed, and context length all shift the answer.

How do I compare LLMs?

Sort by Quality Index for overall strength, then filter by price, speed, or context window to match your constraints. Move to the Compare page to put 2–4 finalists head to head.

Which AI model has the best quality-to-price ratio?

Open-weight models like DeepSeek, Qwen, and Llama often lead on quality-to-price. For agentic workflows, cost per task is usually a better filter than token price alone.

How often is this leaderboard updated?

Data is pulled from Artificial Analysis and refreshed automatically. New models appear as soon as they have benchmark scores and provider endpoints.